California Appellate Report

Thoughts on recent Ninth Circuit and California appellate cases from Professor Shaun Martin at the University of San Diego School of Law.

Monday, January 31, 2005

People v. Purcelle (Cal. Ct. App. - January 31, 2005)

›
Okay, this one has nothing whatsoever to do with the law. Let me just ask a couple of questions instead. When a person you've never s...

Cook v. City of Buena Park (Cal. Ct. App. - January 28, 2005)

›
This opinon is simultaneously disturbing and refreshing. First, it's distressing to learn that a City would not only write and pass a s...
Sunday, January 30, 2005

Hudis v. Crawford (Cal. Ct. App. - January 27, 2005)

›
I've often thought that the "favorable termination" prong in malicious prosecution actions is a fairly strange duck. And this ...

People v. Minor (Cal. Ct. App. - January 27, 2005)

›
Here's a hypothetical. Imagine that you drive drunk, killing one person and seriously injuring two others. You convince the judge to s...
Saturday, January 29, 2005

American Cas. Co. v. General Star Indem. Co. (Cal. Ct. App. - January 27, 2005)

›
Here's a case about the horrible accident that occurred during the filming of The Crow . Talk about excitement! What's that, yo...

Parker v. McCaw (Cal. Ct. App. - January 29, 2004)

›
As I read this case, I was hoping that the lesson would be: "Dude, don't sleep with your clients." But the actual lesson is: ...
Friday, January 28, 2005

Two Section 2800.2 Cases

›
I have to depart from my usual title format to get both of these in, since I thought they were worthy of at least brief mention -- especiall...
Thursday, January 27, 2005

People v. Thoma (Cal. App. - January 26, 2005)

›
Here's an obviously results-oriented decision, and I applaud Justice Gilbert's integrity for dissenting. Yes, I am darn confident ...

Hoveida v. Scripps Health (Cal. App. - January 26, 2005)

›
Justice McConnell holds here that parties cannot create an appealable judgment by stipulating to dismiss the remaining claims without prej...
Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Brekke v. Wills (Cal. Ct. App. - January 25, 2005)

›
There are some cases that an attorney just shouldn't take on appeal. This is one of them. A 15-year old boy is going out with a 16-...

Buckley v. Terhune (9th Cir. - January 25, 2005)

›
Judge Bea writes a very interesting dissent here , in which he applies regular California contract principles to a criminal plea agreement, ...
Tuesday, January 25, 2005

MHC Financing v. City of Santee (Cal. Ct. App. - January 25, 2005)

›
This case is a toughie. To make matters worse, Justice Aaron's opinion is hardly a model of clarity. (And I say that with a great deal ...
Monday, January 24, 2005

People v. Gonzalez (Cal. Supreme Court - January 24, 2005)

›
With all due deference to the unanimous decision of the California Supreme Court in this case, there's a fair bit of difference between...

In Re Dannenberg (Cal. Supreme Ct. - January 24, 2005)

›
Look, I'm no softie when it comes to parole, particularly for individuals convicted of murder (or rape, for that matter). I visibly crin...
Friday, January 21, 2005

Moran v. Ashcroft (9th Cir. - January 20, 2005)

›
Talk about harsh. Martin Moran lives in the United States since 1989 and eventually gets busted by the INS for being in the country illegall...
Thursday, January 20, 2005

In Re: Demetra Pasyanos (Cal. Bar Ct. - January 13, 2005)

›
Generally, I only read (and comment here on) the published opinions of the California Supreme Court, the California Court of Appeals, the Un...

United States v. Bichel (9th Cir. - January 14, 2005)

›
Someone please explain this one to me. I just don't get it. And I don't mean the holding, which seems entirely reasonable. Rather, ...
Wednesday, January 19, 2005

United States v. Mayo (9th Cir. - January 14, 2005)

›
Especially in light of the contours of existing precedent (particularly Belton ), I don't have a problem with the principal issue in thi...

United States v. Alvarez-Gutierrez (9th Cir. - January 14, 2005)

›
Now for some shameless promotion of the judge for whom I formerly clerked. Lest one think that he's uniformly results-oriented, Judge R...
Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Riddle v. Riddle (Cal. App. - January 14, 2005)

›
Here's a divorce case from Orange County which essentially revolves around the correct way a court should evaluate a million-dollar pay...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Shaun Martin
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.