Monday, July 23, 2012

Chula Vista v. Gutierrez (Cal. Ct. App. - July 3, 2012)

Who's going to agree to serve as a receiver when you're (not) paid like this?

Not me, that's for sure.

(And don't think that the hypothetical prospect for being paid by the City -- as opposed by the Bank [which indisputably benefited from the receiver's services] -- will be sufficient.  Good luck with that.)