"On November 7, 2013 the Department received drug testing results for Elizabeth
[]. Elizabeth had tested positive for methamphetamine (at an extremely high
level), amphetamine and marijuana. . . . When
confronted with the test results, Elizabeth again denied methamphetamine use but
confided to the worker she had been sleeping with a neighbor who used
methamphetamine and that her positive test may have resulted from those encounters."
I'm pretty sure that's not how it works. So is the Court of Appeal.
