I mentioned when the original opinion came out last month that I thought that Justice Perren's opinion was particularly enthusiastic. Comparing the appellant to, among other things, King George III. In the opening paragraph, no less.
Today, Justice Perren tones it down a bit. Amending the opinion to remove the references to King George III and monopolists.
It's still a strong opinion. Don't get me wrong.
But the rhetoric is less over the top.
