The Ninth Circuit says today, in full:
"Plaintiffs-Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing (Dkt.
# 38) is GRANTED. The opinion filed June 16, 2017, is
amended as follows: (1) on page two, “millions of plaintiffs’
dollars” is replaced with “plaintiffs’ money”; (2) on page two,
“into bankruptcy” is replaced with “out of business”; and
(3) all uses of the word “privileges” on pages two, six,
fourteen, and twenty are replaced with “authorization.” No
further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will
be considered."
I'm not really sure that the money devoted by plaintiff-appellant to filing that motion was really worth it in retrospect, eh?
