I was just teasing, Justice Rushing. I knew -- or at least suspected -- that the bizarre spelling of "Thus" in this opinion (about which I posted on Friday) was likely the fault of a computer, not an actual typo.
Still, I liked the heading of the amendment posted today. Which I've never seen before, and which says: "(opn. on rehearing; reposted 1/7/08 to correct data corruption occurring in posting process on 1/4/08)"
Hopefully, and presumably, that sort of stuff doesn't happen all the time. Otherwise I'm sure it'd be totally annoying to the respective authors.